Let's say you are in a classroom. This is the most important class of your life, everything hinges on this class. Everything.
What if there were very specific class rules?
What if all the students knew the rules but some took them more seriously than others?
What if someone in the class is cheating? What happens when the other classmates notice?
What if they don't even have to notice, because the student is telling his classmates about it, asking
for high fives and help to beat the system?
What if the classmates know that if the professor discovers it not only the student cheating will be kicked out and lose the ability to graduate, but they too, will Fail the class, lose their credits and fail to graduate. What if this student is scrambling for an A he feels he needs and deserves for any number of reasons. But the fate of the entire class is hanging in the balance!
Is it gossip or bullying to point a finger and say "No way, no way you are going to get away with this." Is it mean for the classmates to protect the class, the greater good over this individual? Is it selling them out? Is mean of the classmates to stand up and say "We are not apart of this, and we want the authorities to know?"
This is the worst metaphor I've ever written because in this scenario, the only people who lose are the class, or, if you aren't following the painfully bad analogy: fellow adoptive families and their potential children. In this metaphor the "A," the graduation, etc, that everyone wants to earn is a commodity, but in real like, what everyone is hoping to have in their lives are really live children, not commodities.
But my point is that by the peers and classmates standing up and saying "What this person is telling us about they ways he is trying to cheat and beat the system is wrong and we don't want these things happening. We don't think this is right" they are not gossiping. They are responding to what the cheater has declared he was actually doing. Now, I can see where it gets messy when the cheater stops talking and some of the students say Well, I didn't hear him say it. You're just speculating. Then it becomes a We Say, He Said" argument.
But gossip and bullying to call the person who announced cheating to accountability and hope they change their tune? I don't think so.
Oh I swear, blog visitors, soon I will return to "We went apple picking look at my cute kids!" posts. Before I do so, I wanted to share what I was thinking about last night. I hope it is taken in the way I think the majority of readers took the last post: a non-judgmental exploration of really, really important adoption issues.
Someone I don't know, Carrie, left an interesting comment on the Big Ethics in Adoption post I recently wrote. She wrote about how corrupt things, people, philosophies are in Uganda. How hard it is for westerners to see and understand unless we've been there and interacted with the people over and over again.
And for the sake of the experience, I went there with her. I am not saying she's right, or that generalizations about people ever can be, but she got me to thinkin.' I love when comments get me thinking. I may be opinionated but I maintain I am always teachable. As a side note, I appreciated everyone who came by and spoke up. I don't know if I've ever used my blog as a platform this way, this dramatically. I hope this discussion continues.
While I do not know if this was her intent, Carrie got me pondering "grey area." Can there be grey area in adoption? I sure didn't make it sound that way on my last post. Black and White. Right and Wrong. Ethical and You're Out of Line.
But as it turns out, I am no stranger to ethical international adoption dilemmas. Some of you visitors might remember the post I wrote about my friend. Several months after being in the US her child's birth family in Ethiopia got a hold of her with some terrible news: Some of them were sick. They had no food, no shelter, and all of a sudden, every Golden Rule of International Adoption seemed irrelevant. These people were her daughter's family, and thus her family, and you help family. My scruples fell away sooner than I ever could have imagined.
In my heart I was all 'Wire the freakin' money transfer, hire someone to take the sisters to a doctor, do the thing, screw "the rules."' You can read a great discussion in the comments section of that post. It was a good learning experience for all of us.
But here we are, back in Uganda. I drew a line in the sand with my post, did I not? Our rules about ethics and codes of conduct serve the greater good by respecting lawmakers in the country, and more importantly they protect families and children. That is what my original post was about. Stunts like what the family-in-question was pulling are unethical and endangering Ugandan adoption, just as similar actions endangered adoptions in Ethiopia and still do.
When we stand for Ethics in Adoption we adoptive parents are standing up for the children who need advocacy and protection from being commodities; items in a trafficker's shopping cart. We are standing up for a world where families aren't torn apart and can stay together when possible. And sometimes we are standing up shouting from the rooftops Follow the rules so you don't ruin adoption for everyone!
But what if there are times when the Code of Ethics and laws in adoption which stand to serve the child. What if the police officer, probate officer, judge whoever -- the people who are supposed to advocate for a specific child fail her?
What if a prospective family or orphanage worker knows for a fact (and I am not saying the family-in-question does, this is all hypothetical and made up by me in the effort to understand how this happens). What if they know that this child's first family is hoping to hang on to her for money?
What if they are positive the 'We want her' stuff is an act? What if the first family is hoping for a bribe, or is pumped about the possibility of sponsorship funds pouring in that will never ever feed the child or place her in a school?
What if there is a clear path for this child being sold by her first parents into prostitution? What if that case officer himself is a ring leader pimp organizing the whole thing?
Let's all go there. Let's go to Uganda (or any country) and see everything, the system, is falling to crap around a kid, and knowing that if we walk away, the best thing that could happen to her is death.
What if it were you or me?
What if I was there, knowing what I know about ethics in adoption and believing how I do, looking at a family that I am losing respect for. Not because they are poor. Not because they live in slums. Not because we live differently, but because they do not treat their daughter with love. Because she has already been cast aside and is broken on the inside in all the ways we see our attachment-challenged and traumatized kids be broken.
Is this so far fetched? For example, there are some of foster/adopt parents in the US that I'd probably support in their fight to keep their kids from returning to abusive first families? I am the first person that will say biology does not necessarily equal Parent, let alone Loving Parent. Hello, I have a child who does not share my DNA, who has a first family. There lots of sperm donors out there who will also stand up and say biology doesn't equal parent either.
So what would I do to get a kid the he$% out of a terrible situation? Would I bend rules? Would I try to make a case before my hypothetical pimp probate officer?
I might.
Would I cry, pray? Maybe tip toe over the line to plead?
I might.
If I am honest, I might.
Would I be tempted to try to save a child? (EVEN THOUGH I HATE THE PHRASE 'SAVE A CHILD' ANYWHERE NEAR ADOPTION!!! DO YOU HEAR ME?! I AM YELLING! HATE IT!)
If I felt I had all the truth of the universe about her situation, no speculation and entitlement driving the decision. Would I do what it took to help her, despite it being wrong on paper?
I don't know. Maybe.
Would I tell the world about the lines I've crossed and the things I felt I had to do to keep this kid safe?
Would I perhaps unintentionally but very effectively scoff at the systems in place, the laws and people of the country I claim to love, as well as all the other adoptive families waiting for their child's ethical process to be complete so they can welcome their children into their arms and new homes; would I spit in their faces by detailing the ways I am breaking the code of ethics and laws that keep adoption open in said country?
Would I trash the birth family in public while using mine and my not-yet-daughters actual name for all the world to Google? Would I sensationalize the experience for thousands and thousands of gaga-eyed followers, creating movie-like drama and up-to-the minute updates on how I was going to beat the system?
Would I ask my thousands of followers to support and approve of my actions?
Would I publish my actions in public so authorities could see them and potentially ruin every shot I've got at adopting this child I love and want to protect or any other child from that country?
Would I tell a soul besides my husband and God about what I felt I had to do?
No. I wouldn't.
So here I stand, after my high-falutin' Ethics Preaching saying I will go to a hypothetical place where perhaps a would-be mother, in a position like the one I've described, may be in what she considers Grey Area.
Maybe that is where that family was at. We don't know. (And a big part of me is all Hard-A and still doesn't care what they thought they knew. Grace's comment on my last post -she's currently the 6 down from the bottom I think- is bringing back my spine even before I hit publish on this post.)
I really want to know what you think. I want to know if you were able to jump into the grey area with me for the sake of discussion. My guess is some of you can. And those who didn't: tell us why.
Before I step away from being Devil's Advocate here, I will close by saying I also am guessing many of us will never go to a place where we unapologetically glorify unethical adoption practices and ask for praise and support for them.
What do you think? And this is so long I don't even have time to re-read, edit, clean up or make better. Also, a box of cereal was just dumped out and I have to head into the hospital this morning with a child who shall remain nameless but pulled out his g-tube (again.) Off we go...
** I love that other folks are thinking about this too. Check out another voice on the matter.
What if there were very specific class rules?
What if all the students knew the rules but some took them more seriously than others?
What if someone in the class is cheating? What happens when the other classmates notice?
What if they don't even have to notice, because the student is telling his classmates about it, asking
for high fives and help to beat the system?
What if the classmates know that if the professor discovers it not only the student cheating will be kicked out and lose the ability to graduate, but they too, will Fail the class, lose their credits and fail to graduate. What if this student is scrambling for an A he feels he needs and deserves for any number of reasons. But the fate of the entire class is hanging in the balance!
Is it gossip or bullying to point a finger and say "No way, no way you are going to get away with this." Is it mean for the classmates to protect the class, the greater good over this individual? Is it selling them out? Is mean of the classmates to stand up and say "We are not apart of this, and we want the authorities to know?"
This is the worst metaphor I've ever written because in this scenario, the only people who lose are the class, or, if you aren't following the painfully bad analogy: fellow adoptive families and their potential children. In this metaphor the "A," the graduation, etc, that everyone wants to earn is a commodity, but in real like, what everyone is hoping to have in their lives are really live children, not commodities.
But my point is that by the peers and classmates standing up and saying "What this person is telling us about they ways he is trying to cheat and beat the system is wrong and we don't want these things happening. We don't think this is right" they are not gossiping. They are responding to what the cheater has declared he was actually doing. Now, I can see where it gets messy when the cheater stops talking and some of the students say Well, I didn't hear him say it. You're just speculating. Then it becomes a We Say, He Said" argument.
But gossip and bullying to call the person who announced cheating to accountability and hope they change their tune? I don't think so.
Oh I swear, blog visitors, soon I will return to "We went apple picking look at my cute kids!" posts. Before I do so, I wanted to share what I was thinking about last night. I hope it is taken in the way I think the majority of readers took the last post: a non-judgmental exploration of really, really important adoption issues.
Someone I don't know, Carrie, left an interesting comment on the Big Ethics in Adoption post I recently wrote. She wrote about how corrupt things, people, philosophies are in Uganda. How hard it is for westerners to see and understand unless we've been there and interacted with the people over and over again.
And for the sake of the experience, I went there with her. I am not saying she's right, or that generalizations about people ever can be, but she got me to thinkin.' I love when comments get me thinking. I may be opinionated but I maintain I am always teachable. As a side note, I appreciated everyone who came by and spoke up. I don't know if I've ever used my blog as a platform this way, this dramatically. I hope this discussion continues.
While I do not know if this was her intent, Carrie got me pondering "grey area." Can there be grey area in adoption? I sure didn't make it sound that way on my last post. Black and White. Right and Wrong. Ethical and You're Out of Line.
But as it turns out, I am no stranger to ethical international adoption dilemmas. Some of you visitors might remember the post I wrote about my friend. Several months after being in the US her child's birth family in Ethiopia got a hold of her with some terrible news: Some of them were sick. They had no food, no shelter, and all of a sudden, every Golden Rule of International Adoption seemed irrelevant. These people were her daughter's family, and thus her family, and you help family. My scruples fell away sooner than I ever could have imagined.
In my heart I was all 'Wire the freakin' money transfer, hire someone to take the sisters to a doctor, do the thing, screw "the rules."' You can read a great discussion in the comments section of that post. It was a good learning experience for all of us.
But here we are, back in Uganda. I drew a line in the sand with my post, did I not? Our rules about ethics and codes of conduct serve the greater good by respecting lawmakers in the country, and more importantly they protect families and children. That is what my original post was about. Stunts like what the family-in-question was pulling are unethical and endangering Ugandan adoption, just as similar actions endangered adoptions in Ethiopia and still do.
When we stand for Ethics in Adoption we adoptive parents are standing up for the children who need advocacy and protection from being commodities; items in a trafficker's shopping cart. We are standing up for a world where families aren't torn apart and can stay together when possible. And sometimes we are standing up shouting from the rooftops Follow the rules so you don't ruin adoption for everyone!
But what if there are times when the Code of Ethics and laws in adoption which stand to serve the child. What if the police officer, probate officer, judge whoever -- the people who are supposed to advocate for a specific child fail her?
What if a prospective family or orphanage worker knows for a fact (and I am not saying the family-in-question does, this is all hypothetical and made up by me in the effort to understand how this happens). What if they know that this child's first family is hoping to hang on to her for money?
What if they are positive the 'We want her' stuff is an act? What if the first family is hoping for a bribe, or is pumped about the possibility of sponsorship funds pouring in that will never ever feed the child or place her in a school?
What if there is a clear path for this child being sold by her first parents into prostitution? What if that case officer himself is a ring leader pimp organizing the whole thing?
Let's all go there. Let's go to Uganda (or any country) and see everything, the system, is falling to crap around a kid, and knowing that if we walk away, the best thing that could happen to her is death.
What if it were you or me?
What if I was there, knowing what I know about ethics in adoption and believing how I do, looking at a family that I am losing respect for. Not because they are poor. Not because they live in slums. Not because we live differently, but because they do not treat their daughter with love. Because she has already been cast aside and is broken on the inside in all the ways we see our attachment-challenged and traumatized kids be broken.
Is this so far fetched? For example, there are some of foster/adopt parents in the US that I'd probably support in their fight to keep their kids from returning to abusive first families? I am the first person that will say biology does not necessarily equal Parent, let alone Loving Parent. Hello, I have a child who does not share my DNA, who has a first family. There lots of sperm donors out there who will also stand up and say biology doesn't equal parent either.
So what would I do to get a kid the he$% out of a terrible situation? Would I bend rules? Would I try to make a case before my hypothetical pimp probate officer?
I might.
Would I cry, pray? Maybe tip toe over the line to plead?
I might.
If I am honest, I might.
Would I be tempted to try to save a child? (EVEN THOUGH I HATE THE PHRASE 'SAVE A CHILD' ANYWHERE NEAR ADOPTION!!! DO YOU HEAR ME?! I AM YELLING! HATE IT!)
If I felt I had all the truth of the universe about her situation, no speculation and entitlement driving the decision. Would I do what it took to help her, despite it being wrong on paper?
I don't know. Maybe.
Would I tell the world about the lines I've crossed and the things I felt I had to do to keep this kid safe?
Would I perhaps unintentionally but very effectively scoff at the systems in place, the laws and people of the country I claim to love, as well as all the other adoptive families waiting for their child's ethical process to be complete so they can welcome their children into their arms and new homes; would I spit in their faces by detailing the ways I am breaking the code of ethics and laws that keep adoption open in said country?
Would I trash the birth family in public while using mine and my not-yet-daughters actual name for all the world to Google? Would I sensationalize the experience for thousands and thousands of gaga-eyed followers, creating movie-like drama and up-to-the minute updates on how I was going to beat the system?
Would I ask my thousands of followers to support and approve of my actions?
Would I publish my actions in public so authorities could see them and potentially ruin every shot I've got at adopting this child I love and want to protect or any other child from that country?
Would I tell a soul besides my husband and God about what I felt I had to do?
No. I wouldn't.
So here I stand, after my high-falutin' Ethics Preaching saying I will go to a hypothetical place where perhaps a would-be mother, in a position like the one I've described, may be in what she considers Grey Area.
Maybe that is where that family was at. We don't know. (And a big part of me is all Hard-A and still doesn't care what they thought they knew. Grace's comment on my last post -she's currently the 6 down from the bottom I think- is bringing back my spine even before I hit publish on this post.)
I really want to know what you think. I want to know if you were able to jump into the grey area with me for the sake of discussion. My guess is some of you can. And those who didn't: tell us why.
Before I step away from being Devil's Advocate here, I will close by saying I also am guessing many of us will never go to a place where we unapologetically glorify unethical adoption practices and ask for praise and support for them.
What do you think? And this is so long I don't even have time to re-read, edit, clean up or make better. Also, a box of cereal was just dumped out and I have to head into the hospital this morning with a child who shall remain nameless but pulled out his g-tube (again.) Off we go...
** I love that other folks are thinking about this too. Check out another voice on the matter.










Her greatest achievements lately include sounding out words from stories, street signs, and doing adding and subtraction in her head. Recently on command she counted by twos and we started working on fives. She can count to 100 by herself.





















































